An analysis found that about 40% of over 1,000 randomly selected Wikipedia articles contain outdated or incorrect information ...

The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit ...

Following The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Atlantic, the online encyclopedia now has daily activities ...

Andrew Huberman, a respected neuroscientist and popular science communicator, has found himself at the center of a digital storm. Once celebrated for bringing science into the mainstream, he’s now the ...

Following a slew of complaints from editors, a Wikimedia Foundation spokesperson confirmed to 404 Media that it’s pausing the two-week test, which began on June 2nd. The experiment put AI-generated ...

More websites, including Wikipedia and academic archives, are grousing about AI freeloaders that siphon their information. They’re fighting back.

Editors almost immediately criticized the pilot, raising concerns that it could damage Wikipedia's credibility.

First reported by Kotaku, Wikipedia recently introduced a quiz game on its official Android app, called Which Came First? The game has a simple premise, which you could probably g ...

According to 404 Media, Wikipedia announced the opt-in AI pilot on June 2, which was set to run for two weeks on the mobile version of the site. The summaries appeared at the top of select articles in ...

Go to Wikipedia’s site.; Tap on the hamburger menu on the top. Tap on Settings. Under the Color section, select “Dark” as the option. Wikipedia says under the Colors tab that this is an ...

The Wikimedia Foundation, a nonprofit group that hosts, develops, and controls Wikipedia, has announced that it won’t be moving forward with plans to add AI-generated summaries to articles after ...

Wikipedia is attempting to dissuade AI developers from scraping the platform by releasing a dataset that’s specifically optimized for training AI models.