News
Florida Supreme Court rejects constitutional challenge to state congressional map
Justices, in a 5-1 decision, said an alternative requested by voting-rights groups for a North Florida district would violate the U.S. Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause because it would involve racial gerrymandering.
The New Republic on MSN5dOpinion
The Supreme Court’s Most Worrisome Non-DecisionThe Roberts Court has asked for reargument in a key redistricting case, a move that strongly suggests the conservative ...
The Supreme Court on Monday sidestepped two major cases concerning partisan gerrymandering, allowing controversial district maps to stand and be used in this fall’s midterm elections. The 9-0 ...
In Gerrymandering in America: The House of Representatives, The Supreme Court and the Future of Popular Sovereignty we show that the amplification of partisan gerrymandering can be traced ...
The New Republic on MSN2dOpinion
Gavin Newsom’s Retaliatory Redistricting Plan Is Good, ActuallyThe California governor is threatening to make a controversial tit-for-tat response if Texas Republicans redraw their state’s ...
And the Court is not allowed to make any decisions on that — which is a complete disconnect from 60-some years of gerrymandering jurisprudence. The court’s been ruling on gerrymandering cases ...
The Supreme Court on Tuesday wrestled with the issue of extreme, partisan gerrymandering, a practice North Carolina college students and others call unconstitutional.
Jeff Shesol previews Gill v. Whitford, an upcoming Supreme Court case on gerrymandering in Wisconsin that could transform the practice of redistricting in the U.S.
The Supreme Court is hearing arguments about a fancifully named political practice that majority parties have long used to lock in their dominance. Here is what it is all about.
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback