Teacher John Scopes was convicted and fined $100 for violating a Tennessee law that banned the teaching of evolution because ...

Former Chief Justice John Marshall’s quote, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is,” is a cornerstone of the doctrine of judicial review, ...

In the seminal case Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court decided that Marbury’s commission was valid and the new administration’s unwillingness to honor it violated a “vested legal right.” ...

The seminal case Marbury v. Madison gave the Supreme Court power to review the constitutionality of laws. Trump threatens to ignore it.

Madison, the case that established the courts’ power to review the law, explained WASHINGTON (AP) — When it comes to respecting the rulings of courts, President Donald Trump has been of two minds.

In Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court established the principle that the courts are the final arbiters of the law.

Madison*, in which the Supreme Court established the principle that the courts are the final arbiters of the law. For all the latest headlines, follow our Google News channel online or via the app.

Madison, in which the Supreme Court established the principle that the courts are the final arbiters of the law.

Madison, in which the Supreme Court established the principle that the courts are the final arbiters of the law. Here are some questions and answers about the judiciary’s role in American ...