The idea that a leader can be immune to laws simply because they believe they are “saving” their country is un-American.

A U.S. Supreme Court decision more than two centuries ago grants the federal courts power to decide if laws and orders ...

Yale is not the only major institution that has self-muzzled in the face of this legal offensive. Indeed, many corporations ...

When, as now, the rule of law itself is threatened, Cornell cannot afford to produce lawyers who would support, or accept, a fascist government’s lawless rule. New York does not need lawyers who would ...

Donald Trump is our lawfully elected president. But he can't run roughshod over the U.S. Constitution, explains Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel.

There are some signs the Trump administration is already not complying with judicial orders. On Monday, a federal judge said ...

In fighting the cases, the Justice Department says the president ... The touchstone for its power as the final arbiter of the law is the 1803 case of Marbury v. Madison, which established the court’s ...

They are fulfilling their duty according to the Constitution and the landmark-of-all-landmarks Supreme Court ruling Marbury v. Madison ... somehow finds the time to fight culture-war battles ...