The Supreme Court just radically endorsed a sweeping intrusion into the privacy of hundreds of millions of Americans by the ...

The justices appear to be trying to avoid a direct conflict with the Trump administration while also blocking certain ...

It is true that Chief Justice John Marshall’s landmark 1803 ruling in Marbury v. Madison established that “it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the ...

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803). In Federalist #51, Publius asks: To what expedient, then, shall we finally resort, for maintaining in practice the necessary partition of power among the ...

But Chief Justice John Marshall seized that power when he wrote in Marbury v. Madison (1803) that it is “emphatically the duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is.” And judges ...

The Hidden Paragraph states “No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no ...

although the constitutional power of judicial review was presumably settled in 1803 with the landmark decision in Marbury v. Madison. In a recent conversation in the New York Times, columnist ...

Locavore! Tumalo Produce Market. (Farmers markets, Wednesday downtown upper Drake Park, Saturdays NW Crossing). Market of Choice. Natural ...