Even as a tenuous cease-fire between Iran and Israel appears to hold, Democrats in the U.S. Congress are falling over ...

Regardless of your view of the current conflicts, one fact is indisputable.  President Trump’s actions violate our ...

If the War Powers Resolution is unconstitutional, it's because it gives the president too much power, not too little.

Against the backdrop of U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, a scholar of presidential powers examines the history and current use of the laws around US military action.

Many presidents chafed at these restrictions. But when it came to major military action, they followed them. George H. W. Bush secured congressional authorization before the Gulf War in 1991. George W ...

As a fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel reportedly holds, prominent legal scholar Alan Dershowitz has sharply ...

Donald Trump’s decision to strike Iran’s key nuclear sites has sparked a major debate over presidential war powers ...

The strikes violate both the Constitution and the 1973 War Powers Act. Whether they are good policy is a more difficult ...

He's been trying to blur "the line between the military and politics" since he first took office in 2017. But it's disturbing ...

A case that the recent US strikes on Iran are unlawful, unnecessary, unpopular, and risky—especially for persecuted Iranian Christians who should be safe and free.

President Donald Trump’s order to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities presents a new test of the Constitution and the extent of ...