A summary of select court decisions addressing whether the use of copyrighted materials to train generative AI (GenAI) tools constitutes fair use.

This is the first time a judge found that an AI company's use of copyrighted material is fair use.

Meta Platforms Inc. continued to successfully fend off a copyright suit from a group of authors suing over its AI model when ...

O n Wednesday, the judge in the landmark AI copyright case Kadrey, et al. v. Meta Platforms Inc. ruled in Meta’s favor. And U ...

During a wild time for copyright law, the US Copyright Office has no one at the helm—and no one knows when that will change.

Two federal judges in the same courthouse came to different opinions on whether AI firms are breaching copyrights, signaling more legal confusion.

U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria found that 13 authors who sued Meta “made the wrong arguments.” But the judge also said that the ruling is limited to the authors in the case and does not mean that ...

Just as a leopard doesn’t change its spots, Google and Meta haven’t changed their ways. Despite mounting legal threats and public backlash, both big tech ...

Opinion: USC law professor Jonathan Barnett says a secure baseline of intellectual property protection, with appropriate ...

Sessions’ allows users to manipulate song structures by moving, extending or replacing sections within tracks.