News

Despite its troubled production and rocky reception, the 2010 remake stands as the stronger and more faithful adaptation to the 1942 original.
U niversal Pictures and Blumhouse are gearing up for their highly anticipated Wolf Man reboot.In the lead-up, director Leigh Whannell is also opening up about his approach to the film. The project ...
Corrections & Clarifications: “Wolf Man” director and co-writer Leigh Whannell's name was incorrect in an earlier version of this article. Pity the werewolf. I mean, duh. You get bitten or ...
‘The Wolf Man’: THR’s 1941 Review. On Dec. 10, 1941, The Hollywood Reporter appraised the latest of Universal’s monster films, finding much to like in the title but wary of audience reaction.
Granted, The Wolf Man isn’t a bad movie, and that principally accounts for Reed’s interest in the text. Here he thought he was going to watch some late-night schlock.
The Wolf Man is, of course, now the cultural touchstone for every werewolf movie that followed, from Chaney’s memorable transformation scene to the script’s incorporation of monster lore.
A shrewd and effective update of The Wolf Man for the Boomer generation, it made werewolves scary again and marked the 1980s as a golden age for sophisticated prosthetics in monster movies.
The Wolf Man did, however, inspire two official Universal-released remakes, including a new one hitting theaters this week, as well as countless inventive knockoffs that riffed on werewolf lore.
It seems the Wolf Man might be his own worse enemy. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works. The upcoming Blumhouse film is the ...
“Wolf Man” stars Christopher Abbott (“Poor Things”) as Blake, who was raised by an overbearing, survivalist father in the wooded mountains of Oregon. Thirty years later, ...
Wolf Man Is Not Set in the Same Universe as Invisible Man, but Leigh Whannell Does See a Connection The Insidious and Saw writer also talked about that Halloween Horror Nights leak, Ryan ...