In Dissent is a recurring series by Anastasia Boden on Supreme Court dissents that have shaped (or reshaped) our country. It was a case that sent one justice into a mental […] ...

From the beginning the Supreme Court has always been guided by the famous pronouncement by Chief Justice John Marshall in ...

Birthright citizenship suffered a setback on Friday, but the judiciary was dealt an even heavier blow.

WASHINGTON - In a twist on the last day of its term, the Supreme Court announced Friday that it will rehear a challenge to the constitutionality of Louisiana’s latest congressional map after the court ...

But when things like Marbury v. Madison are up for grabs, everything is up for grabs,” he said. But “it’s a great time to be fighting for our legal system… ...

Crowell decried the Justice Department’s arguments as a concerning reversal from centuries of legal precedent — set first by Marbury v. Madison, according to Crowell — that would severely limit courts ...

Justice John Marshall famously declared in Marbury v. Madison: It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.

Tension between the president and the Supreme Court is centuries old.

Congress gives opinions on that. But, ultimately, we write law. Constitutionally, all the way back to Marbury v. Madison, the courts actually say what the law is.

Activist judges are increasingly abusing their position to thwart the president’s actions on a nationwide level.

One of the displaced commissioners, William Marbury, sued to compel Jefferson’s secretary of state, James Madison, to allow him to go to work. (Is this all starting to sound familiar yet?) ...