Are you ready to reignite your fantasy season after a poor start? Double your first deposit now up to $100 with today’s ...

Its utility-driven ecosystem has been highlighted by its robust roadmap that takes a linear approach to help foster global ...

"Rather than walking through the four-factor fair use analysis for each case, this column will discuss two significant ...

Courts Lean Toward Fair Use for AI Training: Two California rulings suggest that using copyrighted works to train artificial intelligence (AI) may be considered fair use if outputs are transformative ...

Five authors accused Anthropic of copying millions of books that were purchased, scanned, and pirated to train the Anthropic Claude models. With the court’s permission, Anthropic moved early for ...

The advent of generative AI brings to the forefront many novel and complex legal questions related to fair use and copyright infringement. Historically, assessing whether a particular use ...

The first-of-its-kind ruling that condones AI training as fair use will likely be viewed as a big win for AI companies, but ...

A judge has sided with Anthropic in a copyright case that determined that the company training its AI models on purchased books is fair use.

Judge Leval’s opinion in Romanova does not expressly contradict Campbell. Yet it deliberately attacks the procedural rigidity that has developed since Campbell. Romanova reaffirms that fair use is not ...

Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Fair use traditionally applies to specific, limited uses—not wholesale ingestion of copyrighted content on a global scale.