The Citizens United Supreme Court decision in 2010 is rightly remembered as a devastating blow to American democracy, ...

Citizens United v. the FEC: The Return of Corporate Influence Peddling? Wealthy GOP donors bankroll a multi-front attack on campaign finance laws.

The anniversary of the landmark campaign finance case, Citizens United, is Saturday, and the evidence suggests that we still can't trust corporate political spending In January 2010, the Supreme ...

In the 10 years since the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its landmark decision in Citizens United v. FEC, history has proven the ruling's chief critics completely wrong about its impact on ...

EXCLUSIVE: Citizens United is calling on the Federal Election Commission to end what it calls a campaign finance "loophole" after Mike Bloomberg transferred more than $18 million from his now ...

After getting the First Amendment supremely wrong in Citizens United, the Supreme Court now faces its next money in politics case. In McCutcheon v. FEC, the challengers are attacking a law that says ...

January 21, 2010 | Clip Of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Reactions This clip, title, and description were not created by C-SPAN.

Since the Supreme Court unleashed independent political spending in 2010’s Citizens United v. FEC, progressives have forecast the ruin of American politics by corporate spending. More than a ...

In the 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) handed down Jan. 21, 2010, the Supreme Court ruled longstanding limits on… ...

Citizens United and 16 GOP-led states filed an FEC complaint Thursday accusing Vice President Kamala Harris of improperly taking over President Joe Biden's campaign funds.

The Supreme Court will convene Wednesday during its summer recess to examine Citizens United vs. FEC and decide whether an anti-Hillary Clinton documentary created in 2008 violated restrictions on ...

In 2010, Theodore Olson became a lead attorney in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, a landmark case that concerned election spending and freedom of speech and challenged federal ...