The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit ...

More websites, including Wikipedia and academic archives, are grousing about AI freeloaders that siphon their information. They’re fighting back.

Following The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Atlantic, the online encyclopedia now has daily activities ...

Following a slew of complaints from editors, a Wikimedia Foundation spokesperson confirmed to 404 Media that it’s pausing the two-week test, which began on June 2nd. The experiment put AI-generated ...

How good is your Premier League knowledge over the last 30 years? Time to put your footballing brains to the test in our ...

First reported by Kotaku, Wikipedia recently introduced a quiz game on its official Android app, called Which Came First? The game has a simple premise, which you could probably g ...

Editors almost immediately criticized the pilot, raising concerns that it could damage Wikipedia's credibility.

According to 404 Media, Wikipedia announced the opt-in AI pilot on June 2, which was set to run for two weeks on the mobile version of the site. The summaries appeared at the top of select articles in ...

Wikipedia pauses its AI summary experiment after editor backlash, citing concerns over accuracy, misinformation, and loss of credibility.

“With Simple Article Summaries, you propose giving one singular editor with known reliability and NPOV issues a platform at the very top of any given article, whilst giving zero editorial control to ...

Wikipedia is attempting to dissuade AI developers from scraping the platform by releasing a dataset that’s specifically optimized for training AI models.

Wikipedia has been struggling with the impact that AI crawlers — bots that are scraping text and multimedia from the encyclopedia to train generative artificial intelligence models — have been ...