Only five previous fair-use cases — none involving fine art or photography ... took photos of Prince that the magazine never published. When Vanity Fair paid her $400 three years later ...

Three years later Prince was a superstar ... declaring that judges "should not assume the role of art critic and seek to ascertain ... the meaning of the works at issue." If the Supreme Court ...

Three years later, as Prince shot to stardom ... Judges, the court said, "shouldn't assume the role of art critic and seek to ascertain the intent behind or meaning of the works at issue." ...

An art dealer, A. S. Drey ... of honor at the museum in Manhattan—a gorgeous portrait of a medieval prince, at once beautiful and cruel. The head is perfection. A furry outer jacket partially ...

Three years later, Prince was everywhere ... stating that a judge “should not assume the role of art critic and seek to ascertain the intent behind or meaning of the works at issue.” ...