We shouldn’t change our clocks twice a year. Re: “Daylight saving time all year in California makes no sense” (Mercurynews.com, Dec. 20): Keep standard time. Yes, we should not have to ...

An open letter to Congress: Here we go again with our twice-a-year pleading about the time change. Changing the clocks is a health hazard and worthless economically in this day and age.

In his Wednesday letter, James T. Davenport wrote that he did not like the sun setting so early in the evening.

There are enough other things for us to be legitimately concerned about than eliminating clock changes twice per year. Daylight saving time has been around for a very long time.

Letters to the Editor: Why the clocks changing (or not) isn’t worth your anger. A man enjoys a bike ride as the sun sets at Dockweiler State Beach on March 13. (Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times) ...

I appreciated Ross Gibson’s history of the Town Clock article (May 12), but there were a few missing items. My dad, Robert (Bob) Darrow was the chair of the Citizens Committee for Community ...

Letter: Carbon clocks and Gaussian copulas From Jerome Ravetz, Research Associate, Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, University of Oxford, UK Save ...