After testing out the Compute Stick for a few weeks, I was reminded of Intel's first foray into mobile processors. For years it showed off ugly prototype phones at CES and other tech conventions ...

Equipped with the same processor as Apple’s MacBook, Intel’s Compute Stick gets a powerful performance upgrade in 2016. Intel had redefined what a desktop computer could look like when it ...

The Intel Compute Stick is a PC that fits in the palm of your hand and costs $150, £115 or AU$229. It plugs into a display's HDMI port, and -- when connected to Wi-Fi and peripherals -- offers ...

The latest version of Intel's Compute Stick offers a serious component upgrade, along with a few design tweaks. Instead of low-power Intel Atom processors, which still power most laptops at the ...

Now Intel has sent us the last device we learned about at the beginning of the year: a Core m3-powered version of the Compute Stick that sits somewhere between the Atom version and the Skylake NUC ...

While a number of small manufacturers rushed to market first, Intel was the inspiration for the surge. Rumors about a tiny new PC called the Compute Stick started to circulate in October ...

Is Intel’s Compute Stick a solution looking for a problem, or is this PC the size of a USB stick a solution to a problem you didn’t you know you had? You know, like dude, I can’t stand my so ...

Who wants a cheap HDMI stick that can turn any TV into a full Windows computer? Everybody, right? That’s what we thought. Oh god were we wrong. When Intel announced the $150 Compute Stick at CES ...

But with the next generation of Compute Stick, it looks like Intel has addressed all of our concerns. 1 / 5 The new entry-level Compute Stick (MSRP $159) packs in an Atom x5-z8400, 2GB of RAM and ...

Intel announced a Core M-based version of its Compute Stick pocket PC at the IFA show, part of a small coterie of unexpected announcements Intel made at the trade show here. As expected ...

The story starts with a friend giving me an Intel Compute Stick. But the problems I had were not specific to that hardware, but rather how modern Linux distributions manage their start-up process.