That’s the headline of a States Newsroom piece about a Wednesday filing in Alabama’s congressional redistricting litigation. But I can’t understand why it’s warranted. It’s true that after a ...

A three-judge panel said the congressional map drawn by the 2023 Alabama Legislature violated the Voting Rights Act. The judges, which ruled against the state twice before and put a new map in place ...

A federal court ruling in Alabama could mean another new congressional map for the state, part of a long legal fight over district lines.

The court-ordered map, used in the 2024 elections, resulted in Alabama electing two Black representatives to Congress for the first time in history.

The judges said that the map drawn by the Alabama Legislature in 2023 violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965, just like the one previously drawn by the state. "The long and short of it is that the ...

When a federal court in Alabama last week ruled that the state’s 2023 congressional map violated the Voting Rights Act because it diluted the voices of Black voters, groups that were challenging the ...

A federal court ruling in Alabama could mean another new congressional map for the state, as a panel of federal judges found the version the state drew in 2023 violated the Voting Rights Act ...

May 8 (Reuters) - A federal court ruled on Thursday that Alabama's Republican-led legislature intentionally discriminated against Black voters when it approved a new electoral map in 2023 that ...

Then, in 2023, the Supreme Court ultimately upheld the preliminary court ruling about the 2021 map and sent the issue back to the lower court. Following the Supreme Court ruling, the Alabama ...